“We aren't looking to make much money off of them, but we definitely don't want to lose a ton and open ourselves up for any type of shadiness.” Can't speak for any other book, but there is a reason our novelty props have limits from $10 to $100. Say a book was dumb enough to post $1K limits on this. But even still, that would be a ton of bets/bettors. “No book in their right mind would take $50K limits on that,” Everson’s spokesperson is quoted as saying via Everson’s tweet thread. Patrick Everson, a senior writer for Las Vegas-based, seemed to have a good grip on the sports-betting aspect of the late-game antics.Įverson wrote, in part: “A lot of hullaballoo today about the #SuperBowl streaker purportedly making a $50K bet at +750 that there would be a streaker during the game.”Ībsent any proof to this point, it appears unlikely the gentleman on the field would have been able to make such a bet.Įverson cited a “global-market sportsbook spokesperson” as debunking the idea largely because of the amount rumored to have been wagered. Kevin Harlan's call of the idiot on the field (w/video from : /iAI7WDi5xxĪ restless social media community launched a discussion about “a streaker” being among the myriad Super Bowl prop bets available.Ī day later, it was clear the fan’s sprint was not a spur-of-the-moment idea – and there probably was not any legitimate bookmaking company on the hook for the payout.įirst, the idea of a potential wager then, who was behind the stunt.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |